In physics, a quantum amplifier is an amplifier that uses quantum mechanical methods to amplify a signal; examples include the active elements of lasers and optical amplifiers.
The main properties of the quantum amplifier are its amplification coefficient and uncertainty. These parameters are not independent; the higher the amplification coefficient, the higher the uncertainty (noise). In the case of lasers, the uncertainty corresponds to the amplified spontaneous emission of the active medium. The unavoidable noise of quantum amplifiers is one of the reasons for the use of digital signals in optical communications and can be deduced from the fundamentals of quantum mechanics.
Introduction
An amplifier increases the amplitude of whatever goes through it. While classical amplifiers take in classical signals, quantum amplifiers take in quantum signals, such as coherent states. This does not necessarily mean that the output is a coherent state; indeed, typically it is not. The form of the output depends on the specific amplifier design. Besides amplifying the intensity of the input, quantum amplifiers can also increase the quantum noise present in the signal.
Exposition
The physical electric field in a paraxial single-mode pulse can be approximated with superposition of modes; the electric field \( ~E_{{{\rm {phys}}}}~ \) of a single mode can be described as
\( {\displaystyle {\vec {E}}_{\rm {phys}}({\vec {x}})~=~{\vec {e}}~{\hat {a}}~M({\vec {x}})~\exp(ikz-{\rm {i}}\omega t)~+~{\rm {Hermitian~conjugate}}~} \)
where
\( ~{\vec x}=\{x_{1},x_{2},z\}~ \) is the spatial coordinate vector, with z giving the direction of motion,
\( ~{\vec e}~ \) is the polarization vector of the pulse,
\( ~k~ \) is the wave number in the z direction,
\( ~{\hat a}~ \) is the annihilation operator of the photon in a specific mode \( ~M({\vec x})~ \).
The analysis of the noise in the system is made with respect to the mean value of the annihilation operator. To obtain the noise, one solves for the real and imaginary parts of the projection of the field to a given mode \( ~M({\vec x})~ \). Spatial coordinates do not appear in the solution.
Assume that the mean value of the initial field is \( ~{\left\langle {\hat a}\right\rangle _{{{\rm {initial}}}}}~ \). Physically, the initial state corresponds to the coherent pulse at the input of the optical amplifier; the final state corresponds to the output pulse. The amplitude-phase behavior of the pulse must be known, although only the quantum state of the corresponding mode is important. The pulse may be treated in terms of a single-mode field.
A quantum amplifier is a unitary transform \( \hat U \) , acting the initial state \( ~|{{\rm {initial}}}\rangle ~ \) and producing the amplified state \( ~|{{\rm {final}}}\rangle ~, \) as follows:
\( ~|{{\rm {final}}}\rangle =U|{\rm {initial\rangle }} \)
This equation describes the quantum amplifier in the Schrödinger representation.
The amplification depends on the mean value \( ~\langle {\hat a}\rangle ~ \( of the field operator \( ~{\hat a}~ \( and its dispersion \( ~\langle {\hat a}^{\dagger }{\hat a}\rangle -\langle {\hat a}^{\dagger }\rangle \langle {\hat a}\rangle ~ \) . A coherent state is a state with minimal uncertainty; when the state is transformed, the uncertainty may increase. This increase can be interpreted as noise in the amplifier.
The gain G can be defined as follows:
\( G={\frac {\left\langle {\hat a}\right\rangle _{{{\rm {final}}}}}{\left\langle {\hat a}\right\rangle _{{{\rm {initial}}}}}} \)
The can be written also in the Heisenberg representation; the changes are attributed to the amplification of the field operator. Thus, the evolution of the operator A is given by \( ~{\hat A}={\hat U}^{\dagger }{\hat a}{\hat U}~, \) while the state vector remains unchanged. The gain is given by
\( ~G={\frac {\left\langle {\hat A}\right\rangle _{{{\rm {initial}}}}}{\left\langle {\hat a}\right\rangle _{{{\rm {initial}}}}}}~ \)
In general, the gain G may be complex, and it may depend on the initial state. For laser applications, the amplification of coherent states is important. Therefore, it is usually assumed that the initial state is a coherent state characterized by a complex-valued initial parameter \( ~\alpha ~ \) such that \( ~~|{{\rm {initial}}}\rangle =|\alpha \rangle ~ \). Even with such a restriction, the gain may depend on the amplitude or phase of the initial field.
In the following, the Heisenberg representation is used; all brackets are assumed to be evaluated with respect to the initial coherent state.
\( {\displaystyle {\rm {noise}}=\langle {\hat {A}}^{\dagger }{\hat {A}}\rangle -\langle {\hat {A}}^{\dagger }\rangle \langle {\hat {A}}\rangle -\left(\langle {\hat {a}}^{\dagger }{\hat {a}}\rangle -\langle {\hat {a}}^{\dagger }\rangle \langle {\hat {a}}\rangle \right)} \)
The expectation values are assumed to be evaluated with respect to the initial coherent state. This quantity characterizes the increase of the uncertainty of the field due to amplification. As the uncertainty of the field operator does not depend on its parameter, the quantity above shows how much output field differs from a coherent state.
Linear phase-invariant amplifiers
Linear phase-invariant amplifiers may be described as follows. Assume that the unitary operator U ^ {\displaystyle ~{\hat {U}}~} ~{\hat U}~ amplifies in such a way that the input \( ~{\hat a}~ \) and the output \( ~{\hat A}={{\hat U}}^{\dagger }{\hat a}{\hat U}~ \) are related by a linear equation
\( ~{\hat A}=c{\hat a}+s{\hat b}^{\dagger },
where \( ~c~ \) and \( ~s~ \) are c-numbers and \( ~{\hat b}^{\dagger }~ \) is a creation operator characterizing the amplifier. Without loss of generality, it may be assumed that \( ~c~ \) and \( ~s~ \) are real. The commutator of the field operators is invariant under unitary transformation \( ~{\hat U}~ \) :
\( {\hat A}{\hat A}^{\dagger }-{\hat A}^{\dagger }{\hat A}={\hat a}{\hat a}^{\dagger }-{\hat a}^{\dagger }{\hat a}=1. \)
From the unitarity of \( ~{\hat U}~ \), it follows that \( ~{\hat b}~ \) satisfies the canonical commutation relations for operators with Bose statistics:
\( ~{\hat b}{\hat b}^{\dagger }-{\hat b}^{\dagger }{\hat b}=1~ \)
The c-numbers are then
\( ~c^{2}\!-\!s^{2}=1~. \) [1]
Hence, the phase-invariant amplifier acts by introducing an additional mode to the field, with a large amount of stored energy, behaving as a boson. Calculating the gain and the noise of this amplifier, one finds
\( ~~G\!=\!c~~ \)
and
\( ~~{{\rm {noise}}}=c^{2}\!-\!1. \)
The coefficient \( ~~g\!=\!|G|^{2}~~ \) is sometimes called the intensity amplification coefficient. The noise of the linear phase-invariant amplifier is given by g-1. The gain can be dropped by splitting the beam; the estimate above gives the minimal possible noise of the linear phase-invariant amplifier.
The linear amplifier has an advantage over the multi-mode amplifier: if several modes of a linear amplifier are amplified by the same factor, the noise in each mode is determined independently;that is, modes in a linear quantum amplifier are independent.
To obtain a large amplification coefficient with minimal noise, one may use homodyne detection, constructing a field state with known amplitude and phase, corresponding to the linear phase-invariant amplifier.[2] The uncertainty principle sets the lower bound of quantum noise in an amplifier. In particular, the output of a laser system and the output of an optical generator are not coherent states.
Nonlinear amplifiers
Nonlinear amplifiers do not have a linear relation between their input and output. The maximum noise of a nonlinear amplifier cannot be much smaller than that of an idealized linear amplifier.[1] This limit is determined by the derivatives of the mapping function; a larger derivative implies an amplifier with greater uncertainty.[3] Examples include most lasers, which include near-linear amplifiers, operating close to their threshold and thus exhibiting large uncertainty and nonlinear operation. As with the linear amplifiers, they may preserve the phase and keep the uncertainty low, but there are exceptions. These include parametric oscillators, which amplify while shifting the phase of the input.
References
D. Kouznetsov; D. Rohrlich; R.Ortega (1995). "Quantum limit of noise of a phase-invariant amplifier". Physical Review A. 52 (2): 1665–1669.arXiv:cond-mat/9407011. Bibcode:1995PhRvA..52.1665K. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.52.1665.
Vincent Josse; Metin Sabuncu; Nicolas J. Cerf; Gerd Leuchs; Ulrik L. Andersen (2007). "Universal Optical Amplification without Nonlinearity". Physical Review Letters. 96 (16): 163602.arXiv:quant-ph/0603119. Bibcode:2006PhRvL..96p3602J. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.163602. PMID 16712228.
D. Kouznetsov; D. Rohrlich (1997). "Quantum noise in the mapping of phase space". Optics and Spectroscopy. 82 (6): 909–913. Bibcode:1997OptSp..82..909K.
Further reading
Kim M. S., Lee K. S., Bužek V. (1993). "Amplification of superposition states in phase-sensitive amplifiers". Physical Review A. 47: 4302. Bibcode:1993PhRvA..47.4302K. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.47.4302.
Bondurant R. S. (1993). "Quantum noise properties of a nonlinear amplifier". Physical Review Letters 71: 1709. Bibcode:1993PhRvL..71.1709B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1709.
Mu Yi, Savage C. M. (1994). "Phase-sensitive above-threshold laser amplifiers". Physical Review A. 49: 4093. Bibcode:1994PhRvA..49.4093M. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.49.4093.
Vaccaro John A., Pegg D. T. (1994). "Phase properties of optical linear amplifiers". Physical Review A. 49: 4985. Bibcode:1994PhRvA..49.4985V. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.49.4985.
Loudon Rodney, Jedrkiewicz Ottavia, Barnett Stephen M., Jeffers John (2003). "Quantum limits on noise in dual input-output linear optical amplifiers and attenuators". Physical Review A. 67: 043803.arXiv:quant-ph/0212012. Bibcode:2003PhRvA..67a3803K. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.67.013803.
Lamprecht C., Ritsch H. (2003). "Theory of excess noise in unstable resonator lasers". Physical Review A. 67: 013805.arXiv:quant-ph/0203122. Bibcode:2003PhRvA..67a3805V. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.67.013805.
vte
Quantum mechanics
Background
Introduction History
timeline Glossary Classical mechanics Old quantum theory
Fundamentals
Bra–ket notation Casimir effect Coherence Coherent control Complementarity Density matrix Energy level
degenerate levels excited state ground state QED vacuum QCD vacuum Vacuum state Zero-point energy Hamiltonian Heisenberg uncertainty principle Pauli exclusion principle Measurement Observable Operator Probability distribution Quantum Qubit Qutrit Scattering theory Spin Spontaneous parametric down-conversion Symmetry Symmetry breaking
Spontaneous symmetry breaking No-go theorem No-cloning theorem Von Neumann entropy Wave interference Wave function
collapse Universal wavefunction Wave–particle duality
Matter wave Wave propagation Virtual particle
Quantum
quantum coherence annealing decoherence entanglement fluctuation foam levitation noise nonlocality number realm state superposition system tunnelling Quantum vacuum state
Mathematics
Equations
Dirac Klein–Gordon Pauli Rydberg Schrödinger
Formulations
Heisenberg Interaction Matrix mechanics Path integral formulation Phase space Schrödinger
Other
Quantum
algebra calculus
differential stochastic geometry group Q-analog
List
Interpretations
Bayesian Consistent histories Cosmological Copenhagen de Broglie–Bohm Ensemble Hidden variables Many worlds Objective collapse Quantum logic Relational Stochastic Transactional
Experiments
Afshar Bell's inequality Cold Atom Laboratory Davisson–Germer Delayed-choice quantum eraser Double-slit Elitzur–Vaidman Franck–Hertz experiment Leggett–Garg inequality Mach-Zehnder inter. Popper Quantum eraser Quantum suicide and immortality Schrödinger's cat Stern–Gerlach Wheeler's delayed choice
Science
Measurement problem QBism
Quantum
biology chemistry chaos cognition complexity theory computing
Timeline cosmology dynamics economics finance foundations game theory information nanoscience metrology mind optics probability social science spacetime
Technologies
Quantum technology
links Matrix isolation Phase qubit Quantum dot
cellular automaton display laser single-photon source solar cell Quantum well
laser
Extensions
Dirac sea Fractional quantum mechanics Quantum electrodynamics
links Quantum geometry Quantum field theory
links Quantum gravity
links Quantum information science
links Quantum statistical mechanics Relativistic quantum mechanics De Broglie–Bohm theory Stochastic electrodynamics
Related
Quantum mechanics of time travel Textbooks
vte
Emerging technologies
Fields
Quantum
algorithms amplifier bus cellular automata channel circuit complexity theory computing clock cryptography
post-quantum dynamics electronics error correction finite automata image processing imaging information key distribution logic logic gates machine machine learning metamaterial network neural network optics programming sensing simulator teleportation
Other
Anti-gravity Acoustic levitation Cloak of invisibility Digital scent technology Force field
Plasma window Immersive virtual reality Magnetic refrigeration Phased-array optics Thermoacoustic heat engine
Hellenica World - Scientific Library
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/"
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License
