Quantum Darwinism is a theory meant to explain the emergence of the classical world from the quantum world as due to a process of Darwinian natural selection induced by the environment interacting with the quantum system; where the many possible quantum states are selected against in favor of a stable pointer state. It was proposed in 2003 by Wojciech Zurek and a group of collaborators including Ollivier, Poulin, Paz and Blume-Kohout. The development of the theory is due to the integration of a number of Zurek's research topics pursued over the course of twenty-five years including: pointer states, einselection and decoherence.
A study in 2010 is claimed to provide preliminary supporting evidence of quantum Darwinism with scars of a quantum dot "becoming a family of mother-daughter states" indicating they could "stabilize into multiple pointer states."[1] However, the claimed evidence is also subject to the circularity criticism by Kastner (see Implications below). Basically, the de facto phenomenon of decoherence that underlies the claims of Quantum Darwinism may not really arise in a unitary-only dynamics. Thus, even if there is decoherence, this does not show that macroscopic pointer states naturally emerge without some form of collapse.
Implications
Along with Zurek's related theory of envariance (invariance due to quantum entanglement), quantum Darwinism seeks to explain how the classical world emerges from the quantum world and proposes to answer the quantum measurement problem, the main interpretational challenge for quantum theory. The measurement problem arises because the quantum state vector, the source of all knowledge concerning quantum systems, evolves according to the Schrödinger equation into a linear superposition of different states, predicting paradoxical situations such as “Schrödinger's cat”; situations never experienced in our classical world. Quantum theory has traditionally treated this problem as being resolved by a non-unitary transformation of the state vector at the time of measurement into a definite state. It provides an extremely accurate means of predicting the value of the definite state that will be measured in the form of a probability for each possible measurement value. The physical nature of the transition from the quantum superposition of states to the definite classical state measured is not explained by the traditional theory but is usually assumed as an axiom and was at the basis of the debate between Niels Bohr and Albert Einstein concerning the completeness of quantum theory.
Quantum Darwinism seeks to explain the transition of quantum systems from the vast potentiality of superposed states to the greatly reduced set of pointer states[2] as a selection process, einselection, imposed on the quantum system through its continuous interactions with the environment. All quantum interactions, including measurements, but much more typically interactions with the environment such as with the sea of photons in which all quantum systems are immersed, lead to decoherence or the manifestation of the quantum system in a particular basis dictated by the nature of the interaction in which the quantum system is involved. In the case of interactions with its environment Zurek and his collaborators have shown that a preferred basis into which a quantum system will decohere is the pointer basis underlying predictable classical states. It is in this sense that the pointer states of classical reality are selected from quantum reality and exist in the macroscopic realm in a state able to undergo further evolution. However, the 'einselection' program depends on assuming a particular division of the universal quantum state into 'system' + 'environment', with the different degrees of freedom of the environment posited as having mutually random phases. This phase randomness does not arise from within the quantum state of the universe on its own, and Kastner [3] has pointed out that this limits the explanatory power of the Quantum Darwinism program. Zurek replies to Kastner's criticism in Zurek[4]
As a quantum system’s interactions with its environment results in the recording of many redundant copies of information regarding its pointer states, this information is available to numerous observers able to achieve consensual agreement concerning their information of the quantum state. This aspect of einselection, called by Zurek ‘Environment as a Witness’, results in the potential for objective knowledge.
Darwinian significance
Perhaps of equal significance to the light this theory shines on quantum explanations is its identification of a Darwinian process operating as the selective mechanism establishing our classical reality. As numerous researchers have made clear any system employing a Darwinian process will evolve. As argued by the thesis of Universal Darwinism, Darwinian processes are not confined to biology but are all following the simple Darwinian algorithm:
Reproduction/Heredity; the ability to make copies and thereby produce descendants.
Selection; A process that preferentially selects one trait over another trait, leading to one trait being more numerous after sufficient generations.
Variation; differences in heritable traits that affect "Fitness” or the ability to survive and reproduce leading to differential survival.
Quantum Darwinism appears to conform to this algorithm and thus is aptly named:
Numerous copies are made of pointer states
Pointer states evolve in a continuous, predictable manner, that is descendants inherit many of their traits from ancestor states.
Successive interactions between pointer states and their environment reveal them to evolve and those states to survive which conform to the predictions of classical physics within the macroscopic world.
The analogy to the Variation principle of "simple Darwinism" does not exist since the Pointer states do not mutate and the selection by the environment is among the pointer states preferred by the environment (e.g. location states).
From this view quantum Darwinism provides a Darwinian explanation at the basis of our reality, explaining the unfolding or evolution of our classical macroscopic world.
Notes
Burke, A. M.; Akis, R.; Day, T. E.; Speyer, Gil; Ferry, D. K.; Bennett, B. R. (2010). "Periodic Scarred States in Open Quantum Dots as Evidence of Quantum Darwinism". Physical Review Letters. 104 (17): 176801. Bibcode:2010PhRvL.104q6801B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.176801. PMID 20482124. Lay summary.
Zurek, Wojciech Hubert (2003). "Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical" (PDF). Reviews of Modern Physics. 75 (3): 715–775.arXiv:quant-ph/0105127. Bibcode:2003RvMP...75..715Z. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.75.715. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 21, 2009. Retrieved 2008-08-05.
Kastner, Ruth E. (2014). "'Einselection' of pointer observables: The new H-theorem?". Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. 48: 56–58.arXiv:1406.4126. Bibcode:2014SHPMP..48...56K. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2014.06.004.
Zurek, Wojciech H. (2015). "Classical selection and quantum Darwinism". Physics Today. 68: 56–58. doi:10.1063/PT.3.2761.
References
S. Haroche, J.-M. Raimond, Exploring the Quantum: Atoms, Cavities, and Photons, Oxford University Press (2006), ISBN 0-19-850914-6, p. 77
M. Schlosshauer, Decoherence and the Quantum-to-Classical Transition, Springer 2007, ISBN 3-540-35773-4, Chapter 2.9, p. 85.
Zurek, Wojciech Hubert (2009). "Quantum Darwinism". Nature Physics. 5 (3): 181–188.arXiv:0903.5082. Bibcode:2009NatPh...5..181Z. doi:10.1038/nphys1202.
Blume-Kohout, Robin; Zurek, W. H. (2006). "Quantum Darwinism: Entanglement, branches, and the emergent classicality of redundantly stored quantum information". Physical Review A. 73 (6): 062310. arXiv:quant-ph/0505031. Bibcode:2006PhRvA..73f2310B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.73.062310.
Zurek, W. H. (2003). "Quantum Darwinism and Envariance". arXiv:quant-ph/0308163.
Blume-Kohout, Robin; Zurek, W. H. (2006). "Quantum Darwinism: Entanglement, branches, and the emergent classicality of redundantly stored quantum information". Physical Review A. 73 (6): 062310. arXiv:quant-ph/0505031. Bibcode:2006PhRvA..73f2310B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.73.062310.
Ollivier, Harold; Poulin, David; Zurek, Wojciech H. (2005). "Environment as a Witness: Selective Proliferation of Information and Emergence of Objectivity in a Quantum Universe". Physical Review A. 72 (4): 042113. arXiv:quant-ph/0408125. Bibcode:2005PhRvA..72d2113O. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.72.042113.
Zurek, W. H. (2005). "Probabilities from Entanglement, Born's Rule from Envariance". Physical Review A. 71 (5): 052105.arXiv:quant-ph/0405161. Bibcode:2005PhRvA..71e2105Z. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.71.052105.
Wojciech Hubert Zurek (2018). "Quantum Theory of the Classical: Quantum Jumps, Born's Rule, and Objective Classical Reality via Quantum Darwinism".arXiv:1807.02092 [quant-ph].
Wojciech Hubert Zurek (2007). "Relative States and the Environment: Einselection, Envariance, Quantum Darwinism, and the Existential Interpretation". arXiv:0707.2832 [quant-ph].
Campbell, John (2010). "Quantum Darwinism as a Darwinian process". arXiv:1001.0745 [physics.gen-ph].
External links
Universal Darwinism: Quantum Darwinism
American Physical Society: Quantum Darwinism Published
Nature.com: Natural selection acts on the quantum world
Quantum Darwinism and the Nature of Reality
Zurek's Reply to Kastener's Criticism (2015)
Hellenica World - Scientific Library
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/"
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License
